Efficacy of Heterorhabditis species against Sweet Potato Weevil (Cylas formicarius Fabr.) in tropical islands: a case study of Visayas, Philippines
Abstract
Sweet potato weevil (Cylas formicarius Fabr.) is a serious threat to sweet potato production in the world. This insect pest can cause damage as high as 97% yield reduction when not managed. The use of biological control agents like entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) can be an alternative to the use of synthetic chemicals to manage this insect pest. The aim of this study was to determine the pathogenicity of the four EPN isolates from the Visayas islands in the Philippines in controlling the sweet potato weevil in–vitro and in greenhouse pot trials. All four isolates were initially identified under the Heterorhabditis genera based on the coloration of the cadavers. Of these four, three isolates, namely UBD, AVD, and CP were identified as H. indica and HO1 as H. baujardi. All of these four (4) EPN isolates were equally promising for the control of both larvae and prepupae. Among the four isolates, UBD at 300EPN/ml recorded the highest mortality on larvae (99.4%) and prepupae (88%), highest percent infection on larvae (95%) and prepupae (83.4%), and fastest to achieved LC50 which was 2 days after application on larvae while 4 days on prepupae. At higher concentration, LC50 were achieved faster than in lower concentration across isolates. A lower percent mortality was recorded on prepupae compared to larvae. In the greenhouse experiment, tubers inoculated with UBD isolate at 300EPN/ml obtained the least damage with no apparent weevil feeding damage on the tuber and no adult exit holes. The four isolates were found effective in controlling sweet potato weevil under the tropical island situation in Visayas, Philippines.
Keywords
References
ADAMS, B. J. & NGUYEN, K. B.2002. Taxonomy and systematic. In: Gaugler, R. (Ed) Entomopathogenic Nematology. Wallingford, UK, CABI Publishing, pp.1–33
AMALIN, D.M. & VASQUEZ, E.A. 1993. A Handbook on Philippine Sweet Potato Arthropod Pests and their Natural Enemies. International Potato Center, Los. Baños, Laguna, Philippines. pp. 82. ISBN 971-91361-0-3
BEDDING, R. A. & MOLYNEUX,A. S. 1982. Penetration of insect cuticle by infective juveniles of Heterorhabditisspp. (Heterorhabditidae: Nematoda). Nematologica, 28 (3): 354–359
BURNELL, A. M & STOCK, S. P. 2000. Heterorhabditis, Steinernemaand their bacterial symbionts – lethal pathogens of insects. Nematology, 2 (1): 31-42
CAPINERA, J.L. 2001. Handbook of Vegetable Pests. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA
CAPINERA, J. 2018. Sweet potato weevil, Cylasformicarius (Fabricius). [Online] Available at: http://entnemdept.ufl.edu/creatures/veg/potato/sweetpotato_weevil.htm [Accessed 25 January 2018].
COCKERHAM, K L. 1954. The biology of the sweet potato weevil. LSU Agricultural Experiment Station Reports. 95. http://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/agexp/95
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 2012. Sweet Potato Production Guide. Regional Field Office No. 02, High Value Crops Development Program. pp 1-11.
GAPASIN, R.G. 1989. Studies on the major diseases and insect pests of sweetpotato at VISCA, the Philippines. In Sweet potato Research and Development for Small Farmers. K. T. Mackay, M. K. Palomar, and R. T. Sanico, Eds., pp. 151–168, SEAMEOSEARCA College, Laguna, Philippines.
GAUGLER, R. 1981. Biological control potential of neoaplectanid nematodes. Journal of Nematology, 13:241-249.
GOZEL, U. & GOZEL, C. 2016. Entomopathogenic Nematodes in Pest Management. [Online] Available at: https://www.intechopen.com/books/integrated-pest-management-ipm-environmentally-sound-pest-management/entomopathogenic-nematodes-in-pest-management [Accessed: 27 May 2020].
HUE, S. & LOW, M. 2015. An Insight into Sweet Potato Weevils Management: A Review. Psyche. Hindawi Publishing Corporation. Vol. 2015, Article ID 849560: pp 11 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/849560
JANSSON, R.K., LECRONE,S.H. GAUGLER, R. R. & SMART, G. C. 1990. Potential of entomopathogenic nematodes as biological control agents of the Sweet potato weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 83(5):1818-1826.
KAYA, H.K. & STOCK, S.P. 1997. Techniques in insect nematology. In: Manual of Techniques in Insect Pathology (Ed. L. Lacey). Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA, pp. 281-324.
KORADA, R. R., NASKAR, S. K., PALANISWAMI, M. S. & RAY. R. C. 2010. Management of Sweet Potato Weevil [Cylasformicarius (Fab.)]: An Overview. Journal of Root Crops, 36(1): 14-26
MAYNARD, G. J. HOCHMUTH, M. L. LAMBERTS. 1999. Sweetpotato Production in Florida. http://university.uog.edu/ cals/people/PUBS/Sweetpot/CV13600.pdf
MULLEN, M. A, JONES A., ARBOGAST R. T., SCHALK, J. M., PATERSON, D. R., BOSWELL, T. E., &EARHART, D. R. 1980. Field selection of sweet potato lines and cultivars for resistance to the sweetpotato weevil. Journal of Economic Entomology, 73: 288-290.
NDERITU, J., SILA, M., NYAMASYO, G. & KASINA, M. 2009. Effectiveness of Entomopathogenic Nematodes against Sweet Potato Weevil (CylaspuncticolisBoheman (Coleoptera: Apionidae) Under Semi-Field Condition in Kenya. Journal of Entomology, 6 (3): 145-154.
ONWUEME, I.C. & CHARLES, W. B. 1994. Tropical root and tuber crops: production, perspectives and future prospects,” FAO Plant Prod Prot Paper 126:129, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
REZAEL, N., KARIMI, J., HOSSEINI, M. GOLDANI, M. & CAMPOS-HERRERA, R. 2015. Pathogenicity of Two Species of Entomopathogenic Nematodes Against the Greenhouse Whitefly, Trialeurodesvaporariorum (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), in Laboratory and Greenhouse Experiments. Journal of Nematology 47(1):60–66.
ROVESTI, L. & DESCO, K.V. (1990). Compatibility of chemical pesticides with the entomopathogenic nematodes, Steinernema carpocapsae Weiser and S. feltiae Feilipjev (Nematoda: Steinernematidae). Nematologica 36:237-245.
SHERMAN, M. & TAMASHIRO, M. 1954. The Sweet Potato Weevils in Hawaii Their Biology and Control. Technical Bulletin No. 23. Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Hawaii. pp. 38
SUSURLUK, A. & EHLERS, R. 2007. Field persistence of the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora in different crops. BioControl 53, 627-641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-007-9104-2
VASHISTH, S., Y.S. CHANDEL & P.K. SHARMA. 2013. Entomopathogenic nematodes - A review. Agricultural Reviews, 34: 163-175
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.